November 19, 2008 at 11:59 am (Food, LC, Social Responsibility, Waste Reduction & Recycling)
Think about how much food you eat in a day. Breakfast, lunch, dinner, and those snacks in between. Now think about all of the food that you didn’t eat; the leftovers from ballooning restaurant portions or the extras in the fridge from dinner Friday night. Next time you sit down to eat, take a hard look at your plate and try to think about what you really plan on eating. Do you have time to eat everything you’ve served yourself in a 15-minute lunch break? Should you really be eating a salad that size?
Strive to throw nothing away from your plate. As cliché and silly as it sounds, there are starving people in this world. Children in particular have fallen victim to the hunger that looms over some of the most impoverished continents. Basic foods have become a precious and finite commodity in our world. It is disheartening to know that children go to school every day without breakfast and growling stomachs and are expected to still do their best.
No, you cannot airmail your leftovers to Africa or India to feed the hungry there, but taking a minute to think about what is on your plate before you start eating is a great step towards considering the waste that occurs all over our planet every second of the day. Are you really going to eat all of that?
- Vanessa
Editor’s Note: This post is one in a series published by students in the Sustainability Learning Community at KU. Additional posts from this series can be found under “LC” on the Categories list.
5 Comments
November 19, 2008 at 11:49 am (Food, LC)
Being outside makes people happy. Studies have shown that kids who play outside learn better than kids who stay indoors all day. Such benefits probably carry over to some degree into adulthood. When you garden, you gain exercise, fresh food, and a sense of accomplishment. Gardening also has many environmental benefits, such as improving soil, air, and water quality, reducing the amount of processing and transportation used to get vegetables, and providing habitat for insects and other wildlife.
Campus Garden is a KU Center for Community Outreach project that encourages people to get outside while providing fresh vegetables for campus use. The gardeners meet twice a week (Sunday mornings and Wednesday evenings during growing months) to plant, tend, water, and harvest tomatoes, spinach, okra, squash, peppers, herbs and whatever else we are given. Campus Garden, located next to Grace Pearson scholarship hall, always needs more volunteers. The project is currently small, but with more volunteers could become a large producer of obviously local veggies. For more information contact Margaret Tran at earth@ku.edu
- Jessica
Editor’s Note: This post is one in a series published by students in the Sustainability Learning Community at KU. Additional posts from this series can be found under “LC” on the Categories list.
3 Comments
November 19, 2008 at 11:27 am (Climate Change, Food, LC)
Being a vegetarian isn’t just for those who don’t want to eat meat anymore, it is increasingly popular among environmentalists. While driving a Prius and turning off your lights may be one step towards ‘greening’ your lifestyle, a vegetarianism is a simpler and cheaper way to not only stay healthy but to stay eco-friendly. The production of meat products is not usually considered a productive step in the right direction but after looking at facts about methane and the greenhouse effect, I was convinced.
In the past I was a vegetarian for almost a year, discontinuing only for health reasons, my only reason for giving up meat was to try something different. Why not? After researching the effects of methane on the environment for a discussion project, I was ready to try it again, this time with other motives in mind. The United Nations recently said, “Livestock is one of the top three or four contributors to climate change”.
The University of Kansas does wonderful things to help the environment by planting gardens and recycling, but I have noticed that when I am in the dining halls looking for some basic vegetarian food, all I seem to come up with are carrots and salads. Don’t get me wrong, I understand that being a vegetarian means eating veggies, but where’s the motivation when you are forced to live off of wilted salad from your dorm’s cafeteria, well there’s little. I propose that the university takes a second look at it’s option and even considers locally grow food. I may just sound like a ranting granola eating hippy, but the truth is; I eat green to go green.
- Grace
Editor’s Note: This post is one in a series published by students in the Sustainability Learning Community at KU. Additional posts from this series can be found under “LC” on the Categories list.
2 Comments
November 19, 2008 at 11:23 am (LC, Sustainable Solutions, Water)
The issue that really hits home for me is water conservation. I am from New Mexico so we don’t get very much rain, ever! Yes I have seen snow (although most people are very surprised by this) but as a whole the southwestern region of the United States is drying up. The average rainfall in New Mexico is around 12 inches or less per year.
In New Mexico we conserve water, but places like Kansas and really wet (or rich) places seem to take water conservation for granted. Something that the University of Kansas can do is to have more efficient toilets, showerheads, and faucets in all of the dormitories and Greek housing. I personally love the beautiful landscaping and gardens that we have around campus, but I am sure we can have more efficient water use when it comes to lawn care and gardening. We don’t have to go as far as xeriscape, like we have in New Mexico, but just conserving even a little can help in the long run. We can still have the nice landscape but instead filled with many beautiful shrubs and plants that thrive with far less water than other species. Also I always see the lawns being watered when it’s really windy, or being watered too much and the water is running down the street. Shorter and better-watched watering times would help a lot too.
I know it is not a huge issue in Kansas, but it could be one day, so maybe the University of Kansas could start headstrong on this and lead our way to a brighter, wetter future.
- Julie
Editor’s Note: This post is one in a series published by students in the Sustainability Learning Community at KU. Additional posts from this series can be found under “LC” on the Categories list.
4 Comments
November 19, 2008 at 11:17 am (Energy, LC, Sustainable Solutions)
When you grab your phone from the charger every morning and lazily drop the cord back on to the desk, one would never suspect the wire to have any ulterior, darker motives behind charging your precious iphone. However, it is in fact, a vampire cord! Rest assured you have little risk in being attacked late at night by the charger, but it is making an impact on your life. Chargers and appliances that most all of us utilize on campus continue to use power even while not in use, unnecessarily burning fossil fuels and cash for your microwave to sit there.
The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that US consumers and businesses waste over 4 billion dollars annually from this needless standby power. Now some appliances may need to be plugged in continuously, in which case power isn’t necessarily being wasted, but your fans, chargers, microwaves, coffee makers, lamps, and neon beer signs don’t need to be sucking down extra power when you aren’t using them.
The simplest solution is just to unplug the stuff you’re not going to use for a while. Using power strips are a good way to consolidate electronics and allow you to unplug all your little energy thieves at once. Going the distance, you could also buy EnergyStar labeled appliances that meet strict energy requirements before hitting shelves, saving you cash in the long run with lowered energy bills. Unplugging wasteful vampire appliances can save up to 10% on monthly energy bills. Sometimes a little self-awareness is all people need to change their habits and become a little more sustainable.
- Joe
Editor’s Note: This post is one in a series published by students in the Sustainability Learning Community at KU. Additional posts from this series can be found under “LC” on the Categories list.
4 Comments
November 19, 2008 at 11:12 am (Education, Energy, Green Building, LC)
Lately, it’s all about green, green, green; the color? No! The environment, obviously. But is that all there is? Maybe it is time to combine the two. Can’t we be “green” with pinks, yellows and oranges? FIDER knows what’s up. They are making it a requirement for all interior design students to learn and have a good understanding of what sustainability means. Though they are not making sustainability a mandatory aspect of design, at least the students are being educated about it. I’m sure you’ll agree when I say: this is a small step in the right direction.
Luckily, design students are not the only college goers with sustainability awareness. Oberlin College conducted a huge experiment proving that if students know their levels of energy use, they are more likely to cut it down; granted it was made into a contest for motivational purposes, but it’s still legit. Now, you may say, “So what? If it was a contest, it means nothing, anyone will do something for a prize”, but that’s simply not the underlying point.
A little knowledge goes a long way. People will care for the environment when taught about its importance and needs. If everyone knew all the simple, little things we can do to help sustain our resources, small gestures of sustainability would have a huge impact. Prove to me otherwise, and then we can talk. It’s about those that are making a difference, not those that are not. So, take a look around. Need a new color scheme? Is it time for you to call a knowledgeable interior designer? I mean… green isn’t all bad…
- Monica
Editor’s Note: This post is one in a series published by students in the Sustainability Learning Community at KU. Additional posts from this series can be found under “LC” on the Categories list.
2 Comments
November 19, 2008 at 11:09 am (Green Building, LC, Sustainable Solutions, Water)
Campus gardens are beautiful. There is no argument there. It seems as though some kind of flowering plant is always in bloom, no matter what season. It’s here that the problem arises. Sustainable gardens incorporate plants and flowers native to the area. They flourish in their native environments, requiring little if no maintenance, fertilizer, and extra water. Sustainable gardens also include perennial flowers that do not need to be reseeded.
Looking around KU, I have seen many people working hard in the various gardens, shoveling fertilizers and compost into gardens, digging up dead annual flowers, and watering existing plants. With the size of campus, and the number of gardens that can be found, I really wonder how much time and money are wasted on these not so “green” gardens. Furthermore, I am also curious about the affects of the fertilizer on campus. Could this be contributing to the nasty surface scum on Potter Lake? I think so. If you are familiar with the Potter Lake Project, students working to make it less of an eyesore also reported it to be polluted last year. Or even just how much water we are wasting irrigating those flowers.
I can turn the water off while I brush my teeth for the rest of my life and it won’t even come close to the gallons of water KU would save with sustainable gardens. Don’t get me wrong, I’m sure that KU has taken steps for a more sustainable existence. But I think that we can do more. If we convert the unsustainable gardens as KU to gardens that integrate native plants, perennial flowers, and plants that attract insects beneficial to the environment, KU could save time, money, and most of all, the environment.
- Taylor
Editor’s Note: This post is one in a series published by students in the Sustainability Learning Community at KU. Additional posts from this series can be found under “LC” on the Categories list.
1 Comment
November 19, 2008 at 11:04 am (LC, Waste Reduction & Recycling)
The University of Kansas does not have an adequate glass recycling program. It is just as important to recycle glass products as it is to recycle paper, aluminum and plastic products. Think about all those bear bottles that are just thrown away in the trash. Glass is a product that can be recycled completely back to its original self. Unlike glass, plastics are only downgraded, which is not as efficient as glass recycling. Manufacturers are using cullet (broken glass) to supplement raw materials. Using cullet saves money and helps the environment. Cullet costs less than raw materials and prolongs furnace life wince it melts at a lower temperature. Cullet also demands less energy from power sources like electricity, natural gas and coal. Less energy used means reduced emissions of nitrogen oxide and carbon dioxide, both are green house gasses (http://www.solidwastedistrict.com/stats/glass.html).
Though it is vital to recycle plastics, they will never be recycled back to its original self. This process is called downgrading. Most recycled plastics are recycled into non-recyclable secondary products. Since most plastic reprocessing leads to secondary products that are not themselves recycled, this material is only temporarily diverted from landfills. Our choice is limited to recycling or wasting. Source reduction is preferable for many types of plastic and isn’t difficult. Opportunities include using refillable containers like those indestructible Nalgene water bottles. Also to buy in bulk from stores like Costco and Sam’s club. It’s also important to buy things that don’t need much packaging, and buying things in recyclable and recycled packages (http://www.ecologycenter.org/ptf/misconceptions.html).
- Rion
Editor’s Note: This post is one in a series published by students in the Sustainability Learning Community at KU. Additional posts from this series can be found under “LC” on the Categories list.
2 Comments
November 19, 2008 at 10:59 am (LC, Waste Reduction & Recycling)
The first time I went to a recycling center, I was amazed. It was the Wal-Mart recycling center in Lawrence and I seriously thought it was the coolest thing ever. My sister and I had so much fun separating all of the recyclables. But the thing I have come to realize is that most people hate taking the time to recycle so much, that they simply just don’t do it. Recycling is important because we literally have no space for waste according to recycling guide.org. We need to make recycling more accessible to everyone, especially to college students. Most of my friends that don’t recycle say it’s because they either don’t see a recycling bin close by when they need it, or that it gets too confusing to figure out which bottle or paper goes in what bin. Treehugger.com says that 1 in 6 people don’t recycle because it’s not available in their area. We need to make it more available to everyone, starting with the University of Kansas campus. I see recycling bins in my dorm and that’s about it. There need to be bins in all of the buildings on every floor and outside on the sidewalks. They should be just as frequent on campus as trash cans are. The bins also need to clearly say what is supposed to be put in them. I believe students on campus would use these recycling bins if they were easier to find and to use.
- Elizabeth
Editor’s Note: This post is one in a series published by students in the Sustainability Learning Community at KU. Additional posts from this series can be found under “LC” on the Categories list.
3 Comments
November 19, 2008 at 10:56 am (Green Building, LC, Sustainable Solutions, Waste Reduction & Recycling, Water)
I am a huge proponent of xeriscaping. Many people don’t know what it is, so I’ll define it as Webster does: xeriscape is defined as a landscaping method developed especially for arid and semiarid climates that utilizes water-conserving techniques (as the use of drought-tolerant plants, mulch, and efficient irrigation). Basically, its returning the environment in your front lawn to what the environment would have been like before your house was there. I have been in the landscaping business for about four years, and have had enough experience to completely verify all of these statements. The basis of the argument for the use of xeriscape is that “turf” lawns require fertilizer, extra irrigation, and gas extensive maintenance. With the use of native plants, it eliminates the need for fertilizer and irrigation, and drastically reduces the need for maintenance. In southern Florida, there was a law put into place that made a lenient form of xeriscape mandatory. They found that this simple form of xeriscape reduced the water use for irrigation by half. The other benefits, of course, being less water pollution due to the negated need for fertilizer. The air will also be much cleaner, due not only to reduced gas consumption, but also because bushes and trees produce much more oxygen than turf grass. Here in Lawrence, I see many houses that run irrigation systems every day. They are being run to support these really thirsty lawns of fescue grass that, in reality, should not be used as a turf grass in any other place than Seattle. The use of xeriscaping in Lawrence could improve the water and fertilizer consumption greatly. In short, xeriscaping will provide a better local ecosystem and will be more naturally beautiful.
- Dan
Editor’s Note: This post is one in a series published by students in the Sustainability Learning Community at KU. Additional posts from this series can be found under “LC” on the Categories list.
1 Comment
